How companies can deal with in-work sickness - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
就业

How companies can deal with in-work sickness

High levels of post-pandemic absenteeism are creating headaches for employers

The coronavirus pandemic is over, but increased sickness is not. In many developed economies, more working people are reporting illnesses that limit the amount or type of work they can do than pre-pandemic. More sick days are being taken, too. German executives warn high absenteeism is compounding the country’s competitiveness problems; in September, Tesla bosses resorted to snap home visits to check up on absent employees at its Berlin plant. In Norway, workers called in sick in the second quarter more than at any time in the past 15 years.

In the UK, official figures estimated a record 185.6mn working days were lost through sickness absence in 2022, for reasons including minor illnesses, musculoskeletal problems and mental health conditions. Post-pandemic healthcare backlogs are partly responsible. Last year some 3.7mn working-age people were in work with a “work-limiting” condition — up 1.4mn in 10 years. The rate of work-limiting conditions has grown fastest among young workers, with sharp increases in reported mental ill health.

Having fewer people working means economies do not grow as fast as they could. It reduces tax receipts to fund increasingly strained public services. But it is employers and businesses that have to deal with the immediate effects of sickness — managing staff and rotas, and confronting any legal backlash. Changes in diagnosis rates and generational attitudes to mental ill health, in particular, have influenced employee expectations of the workplace.

Prioritising employee wellbeing is about building trust and loyalty as well as ensuring long-term productivity. Compassion has to be balanced with practicality. Bosses must provide adequate support to absent workers — but also take into account the impact on other staff and operations.

A transparent and fair sickness policy is vital. Companies need to lay out expectations for reporting illness, documenting absences and returning to work — including when doctor’s notes are needed. If employees know they will be treated fairly and consistently, they are more likely to adhere to the rules, fostering a culture of mutual respect and accountability.

Identifying patterns of absenteeism can help to reveal underlying issues, such as frequent Monday absences or sick leave during school holidays, and signal when bosses need to step in earlier to address concerns at home, burnout or stress. But any sense that bosses are using data ultimately to punish staff will backfire, breeding resentment.

Data should be a conversation starter to better understand the conditions of absences rather than hitting out at those perceived to be slacking. Absenteeism can reflect deeper issues such as excessive workloads, demotivated staff or a lack of support.

But the need for support during poor health is matched by the need for accountability. Problems arise when managers feel trust is being exploited. Setting boundaries on flexible policies and maintaining clear expectations can prevent abuse while still offering assistance. Employees must understand that flexibility is often a benefit, not an entitlement, and respect the parameters set by their employers.

For bosses, employee health information also needs to be handled with the utmost care, and not just to avoid any legal ramifications. When employees believe that their most sensitive information is met with discretion, they will be more open to sharing health issues, and seeking support at their most vulnerable time.

Some companies rely on high pay or rewarding work to attract staff, but in a competitive market, commitments to wellbeing can also help employers to stand out. Building a successful enterprise relies above all, though, on both sides creating a relationship of trust.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

为什么欧洲无法只依靠法国的核保护伞

马克龙已邀请其他欧洲领导人讨论是否能够以及如何利用法国的核武库来威慑俄罗斯未来的侵略。

伦敦在“打击犯罪的技术竞赛”中扩展闭路电视网络

随着警方努力应对街头犯罪激增,伦敦各区议会急于配备人工智能摄像头。

Lex专栏:风险无法浇灭黄金投资者的热情

黄金是抵御地缘政治动荡、通货膨胀和低利率的终极减震器。

能源账单飙升令阿尔巴尼斯在澳大选中陷入被动

生活成本担忧加剧,澳大利亚反对党指责政府的可再生能源政策导致价格上涨。

Lex专栏:美国屋顶太阳能业务前景黯淡

更长的高利率和敌视清洁能源的总统是一个有毒的组合。

关税不确定性增加美联储设定利率的难度

经济学家警告称,在市场波动性加剧之际,美联储过于依赖后顾性数据存在风险。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×