Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

在与特朗普的较量中,全球领导人的支持率上升

从加拿大到乌克兰,各国民众团结在领导人周围,支持他们抵御美国总统的威胁。

欧洲与美国股市的脱钩才刚刚开始

投资者投资组合的长期再平衡可能正在进行,这对美国来说可能是痛苦的。

特朗普的贸易“解放日”是什么?

美国总统将4月2日定为全面升级关税政策的时刻。

“这不是父母的错”:数字权利活动家比班•基德龙

这位从电影导演转为无党派上议院议员的人士谈论了与大型科技公司斗争以保护儿童的经历,以及失声如何让她对权力有了新的见解。

使利比亚持续分裂的非法石油贸易

高额补贴的燃料被走私出境,销往国外,帮助维持对立政治派别的生存。

暴雨将至:我们为何忽视地表水泛滥风险的上升?

新的模型显示,英国有460万处房产面临降雨量超过地面吸收能力的风险,比一年前增加了43%。保险公司正在撤退,但很少有房主愿意接受他们的脆弱性。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×